compulsory process clause造句

例句与造句

1. The Compulsory Process Clause guarantees the defendant the right to obtain favorable witnesses at trial.
2. Marshall warned that the right given by the compulsory process clause must be protected by the courts.
3. The Court held that " The Compulsory Process Clause provides [ the defendant ] with an effective weapon, but it is a weapon that cannot be used irresponsibly ".
4. Stevens wrote that " [ t ] he Compulsory Process Clause provides [ the defendant ] with an effective weapon, but it is a weapon that cannot be used irresponsibly ".
5. As the misconduct of the judge towards the defense counsel did not implicate the Sixth Amendment's Compulsory Process Clause, there was no need to disrupt the lower courts'decisions.
6. It's difficult to find compulsory process clause in a sentence. 用compulsory process clause造句挺难的
7. With this context in mind, she said, the Compulsory Process Clause likely enshrined the right to subpoena witnesses and have a fair trial, rather than a broader " right to have a defense ".
8. "Taylor " was the first Compulsory Process Clause case since " Washington v . Texas " to provide a specific limitation on the right of defendants to force their witnesses to testify.
9. In " Washington ", the Court incorporated the Compulsory Process Clause against the states, holding that " the Constitution is violated by arbitrary rules that prevent whole categories of defense witnesses from testifying ".
10. The first time the scope of the Compulsory Processes Clause was addressed was in 1807 by Chief Justice John Marshall in the case of " United States v . Burr " ( C . C . D . Va . 1807 ).
11. After determining that the Sixth Amendment's " right to compulsory process is applicable in this state proceeding " ( i . e . that the Compulsory Process Clause applied to the states ), the question became whether the specific instance of Washington's trial was an unconstitutional deprivation of that right.
12. The majority, seven, voted for the United States, while only two voted against it .  The Justice Department successfully argued before the court that the clause must be interpreted narrowly if a  proper and reasonable balance is to be struck between the duties of the federal government, the interests of the criminal defendant, and the concerns of the alien witness .  The court concluded that in order to establish a violation of the compulsory process clause, the defendant must show that  The testimony of the deported witness would have been material and favorable to his defense in ways not merely cumulative to testimony of available witnesses .  Unless the defendant is able to do this, the indictment should not be dismissed.